To take advantage of big cost savings in information technology, a study says businesses need to change their buying habits. Here’s how.
Despite an unprecedented trend to control information-technology costs, the majority of companies fail to achieve maximum savings, according to a multi-nation Forrester Consulting study.
“After surveying 304 IT decision-makers, Forrester found that even though IT budgets are under constant scrutiny, businesses have defaulted to vendor influence which has blinded them to the rewards of extending hardware lifecycles and third-party maintenance solutions,” according to the 2013 report.
Seventy-six percent of respondents want to minimize expenditures, but they don’t know they’re overpaying in the two ways.
Little wonder why the top IT decision-maker for many companies is not the chief information officer – the chief financial officer is.
Many CIOs are too obtuse in finance.
Instead, they should become budget savvy. In essence, CIOs should learn how to get more respect in the C-suite.
The Forrester study is entitled, “Challenging The Status Quo On Maintenance Contracts And Refresh Cycles To Lower Costs.”
More key findings:
— Up to 79 percent of organizations refresh their wired networking infrastructure every one to five years guided by industry averages that originate from the vendors.
— Vendors set the end of life agenda resulting in the sometimes unnecessary and expensive replacement of IT equipment – that still carries market value and has 20 plus years mean time between failures.
— End of life equipment is prematurely retired. Eighty-five percent of respondents admitted that they would have kept their legacy networking equipment if the vendor continued to support it.
— Original equipment manufacturer maintenance services have little return on investment. More than 80 percent of organizations buy maintenance contracts from their equipment manufacturer even though they see little value in what they are purchasing and express discontent over misrepresented cost savings, new fees, and inflexible pricing models.
— Third-party maintenance options are widely unknown. Only 21 percent report that they have leveraged competitor third-party bids when negotiating service and maintenance contracts, while 80 percent claim they would leverage third-party maintenance if they found it to be more affordable than their current contract.
- Keep what’s working within an existing infrastructure to avoid premature and unnecessary upgrades.
- Don’t pay for software updates if there are none, or if they are available for free. Organizations should carefully scrutinize ongoing maintenance contracts in order to find valuable operational expenditure savings.
- Put maintenance contracts out for competitive bid, not just to different resellers, but also include third-party options.
- Put metrics in place to reward value, quality, and longevity, not just resiliency.
The survey’s methodology: Interviews were conducted with IT decision-makers in Australia, France, Germany, India, Japan, Singapore, the United Kingdom, and the United States.
Respondents included decision-makers in executive positions, finance, information technology, and procurement.
“Every CIO should make it a priority to read this report,” says Mike Sheldon, president and CEO Curvature (www.curvature.com), formerly Network Hardware Resale, which sponsored the study.
“Businesses of all sizes need to know that there can be incredible value and cost savings with a reliable third-party maintenance service provider – helping to ease worries about tightening IT budgets without sacrificing quality,” he adds.
Amen. Review your overall business situation, how vendors are selected, upgrading solutions, end of life, and maintenance.
From the Coach’s Corner, editor’s picks for related reading:
Two Studies Indicate Need for IT Pros to Get Businesslike — CEOs have long complained to me about information technology. They complain about high-priced consultants, and that IT projects are too expensive and fail to yield a return on investment. Indeed, two studies underscored the need for IT professionals to become more businesslike.
Risk Management – Picking the Best Cloud Storage Provider — Choosing the right cloud storage provider is a must for risk management. You have a vast array of options. Cost is important, of course, but so are your company’s risk-management needs – just like the federal government.
Do BYOD Headaches Outweigh Benefits? Yes — More than half — 53 percent — of surveyed global businesses admit they’re not ready to defend against attacks on their employees’ bring their own device (BYOD) devices. Nearly all say their devices might have been attacked.
“Beware of little expenses. A small leak will sink a great ship.”